• Who we are
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Where in the world is Mac?

    2012 - 05.16

    My it’s been a while. It seems the well has run dry. Even the historic statement by President Obama didn’t get a comment from me.  Until now.

    Here’s my thoughts . . . .

    His statement will eventually help his campaign, but probably not in the way most would imagine. It’s generally known that over 50% of Americans APPROVE of same gender marriage, and there a significant percentage that are indifferent.

    That’s where the help will come from.  Ultra right wingers will soon be foaming at the mouth about the upcoming destruction of the United States because guys like Ricky and Brad who got married years ago in another country will suddenly have their marriages recognized in the US.  They will go on and on about the destruction of families, the devastation of American, and God’s wrath raining down on everyone because couples who have in all liklihood committed their lives to one another quite some time ago, will now make it legal.

    Somehow this will cause harm to their marriages, their children, and their faith. Interestingly, they’re never able to say just how that will happen.

    Anyway, here’s how it will help: the normal people who are indifferent will soon start to roll their eyes at the absurdity of this behavior. They’ll begin to give the topic some serious thought and realize that allowing exisitng laws to apply to couples who already live together and share their lives really won’t hurt anyone, and in fact may actually help society. They’ll reflect that the problems with straight marriage today pretty much have nothing to do with anyone but the people actually involved.

    Then they’ll run the opposite direction from what the once admirable Republican party has become, and vote Democrat.

    There.

    Today’s Gay Agenda: Where in the world is Mac? Tagging along with Ricky for an assignment in northern Italy at the moment. In the big picture: I left my corporate VP job in a company of 25,000 employees over a year ago and joined a private consulting firm of under 100 a few months ago. Suddenly things got super busy and I’m running hard. And having a great time.

     

    Springtime Smuggling

    2012 - 04.08

    After sharing nearly 10 years together, certain rituals have developed that are now a springtime certainty like a panicky attachment of a sump pump hose or being the first guy in the neighborhood to mow the lawn.

    Spring cleaning.

    It starts with me making a wisecrack like ‘it looks like a gang of chimpanzees have been living here’ or ‘this house smells like old man, and I know it’s not me’ or ‘do you really need seven wire whisks and a 1 quart ladle in the tool bin by the stove?’

    The last snarky comment is not received warmly, since my only function in regard to the stove is to windex it on a regular basis.

    Ricky never met a houseplant he did not want to adopt and make part of our family; a grocery bag that did not have a future somewhere; or an unopened trade journal that would be his savior from boredom on some slow progressing flight somehwere.

    At one point I owned and lived in 3 different homes in 1 year. I live by the mantra ‘when in doubt, throw it out.’

    Hence the conflict.

    A few years ago I learned how to overcome this disparity. When Ricky’s really busy or out of town, I begin smuggling things out of the house unbeknownst (supposedly) to him.

    It starts with underwear. As I sort laundry, anything with a hole or elastic that has exceeded its useful life goes in the trash, never to reappear upstairs again. Same with socks. Those two are super easy.

    Where the real challenge lies is in the aforementioned kitchen. As I said, my role is to sit at the counter, drink martinis and encourage/criticize whatever gastronomic project Ricky has going.

    That being said, I truly see no need for 32 plastic containers, 13 of which have no matching lid; to remain living in our home. Nor do I see the need for 4 spring form pans to fall out of the cabinet where I keep my espresso every morning because Ricky made a show-stopping cake 4 months ago.

    A 1 gallon jug living under the sink that contains 3 tablespoons of oil left over from a deep-fried appetizer isn’t necessary. Nor are the 9 bottles of dish washing liquid residing there since someone’s brain was stuck on ‘pick up dishwashing liquid’ every time he went to the store for about 4 months. Neither are the 400 grocery bags that spring out of the cabinet like dime store magic trick snakes popping out of a can.

    Hence the smuggling.

    What oil fits, goes into an existing normal bottle in the cabinet. One tablespoon of oil left goes down the drain and the jug in the recycling. The spring form pans go to the basement. The dishwashing liquid gets dropped at a charitable residence facility and the gazillion grocery bags get wadded into the bottom of a tall kitchen garbage bag and topped off with normal household trash so Ricky doesn’t spot them.

    The stack of unwrapped trade journals slip out with the recycling one by one by one for a few weeks. The ugly shirts or ill-fitting pants make their way to the thrift store; the old floor lamp that makes a zzzztttt sound when you turn it on mysteriously disappears right before the garbage truck appears.

    And the three dozen plastic containers with no mates appear to be arranged especially neat, not because they’re neat, but because half their ranks have been tossed.

    This spring there has been a slight change to the ritual. Ricky’s on to my game and figured out not only what I’m up to, but how to leverage it to his advantage.

    Remember the houseplant adoption issue mentioned earlier? Every now and then an orchid appears on the dining room table in spectacular bloom. Ricky has what I thought were 4 or 5 orchids and a dozen or so  plants hiding behind the sofa in front of the glass doors in the sunroom. (Great spot for plants to hide and get some sunshine) They’d appear and take center stage when in bloom then go away and not come out until they were ready to be pretty again.

    This week I took a peek behind there and found no less that 12 orchids in various states of death along with assorted vin-y things, some globby cactus-like creepy things and some mildew.

    Apparently Ricky has figured out my smuggling trick. He just does it in reverse.

    Today’s Gay Agenda: Hope your spring cleaning is all it can be. Greener lawns and cleaner cars a right around the corner.

    In your Easter Bonnet

    2012 - 04.06

    *For some reason I will never understand, this is the most popular post ever on TGA. It’s been read over 2,300 times. I decided to add photos I took after writing this.

    Enjoy. Happy  Easter!

    Here’s what Ricky and I are doing this Easter weekend to advance the gay agenda of destroying American society and traditional families:

    I will spend Saturday afternoon digging out Ricky’s mother’s wedding china, sterling and crystal as well as my mother’s wedding china; various linen table cloths and napkins from long gone grandmothers and setting our tables in such a way Martha Stewart would be envious, or at least approve. Yes, I realize it’s stereotypical we each have our mom’s wedding china, but all our sisters (we have 3 between us) acknowledge we entertain alot, and we entertain BIG, so if they’re going to enjoy mom’s china, they know it will probably happen at our house.

    Ricky’s mother’s wedding china

    My mother’s wedding china

    Sniffer will go to the Pretty Puppy Parlor @ 2 p.m. for a shampoo and set.

    Saturday evening we will have dinner with my daughter and her new gentleman friend. He’s a young man I’ve known since his birth and comes from a great family. Although he’s 27 and she’s 21, I understand as kids get older age difference isn’t quite as critical. (Ricky is 6 years older than I–we met when I was 39 and he 45)

    Easter Sunday Ricky will sing in the church choir while dinner for 14 bakes in the oven. We’re doing a list of favorite family recipes from our mothers and grandmothers. Back in the day, everything went in the oven. Nobody knew what it meant to saute something, in fact everyone probably thought saute was a dirty word.

    Sunroom table set with Ricky’s mother’s china

    Dining room table set with my mom’s china

    We will then host Ricky’s son and wife, our two grand kids; Ricky’s daughter; their mother (that’s right–family holidays are not about whether Brad and Ethel can be in the same room); my mother; my sister & her gentleman friend and my sister’s 16 year old daughter.

    Alert the Minnesota Family Council as well as James Dobson & Focus on the Family—this is what two very determined gay guys are doing to destroy your family and bring about the downfall of society as we know it. Expect fire and brimstone around 4 p.m.

    Today’s Gay Agenda: Recognize our vanilla suburban life isn’t filled with nearly as much debauchery as the fundies would expect. Say an extra prayer of thanks at Easter service for this odd conglomeration of people we love and who love us right back.

     

    Mob Rule rules

    2012 - 04.04

    There’s a disturbing trend that seems to be appearing in ND & MN politics: our legislators refusing to put on their big boy and big girl panties and make sound, sensible decisions.  Rather they turn controversial topics over to public vote.

    Our nation has a long a rich history of extremely controversial and socially entrenched practices being overturned by the courts. In our lifetimes it’s most obviously civil rights for minorities in general and blacks specifically.

    The list went on of the horror that would befall society if black kids and white kids went to school together. And hellfire and damnation would most certainly rain down on America if a black man married a white woman.

    Well, neither happened.

    But what would have happened if the courts had let the teeming mobs decide these difficult issues? Inviting the majority to decide what rights the minorities should be entitled has never been a good idea.

    In the next few months mobs will decide three important social issues:

    Repeal ND property taxes–a great idea with virtually no plan as to where the replacement funds are going to come from to support our local communities. (hint: drop income tax like other states have done) Let the legislation scramble to figure out where this magical replacement funding will come from rather than towns like Mayville, Hillsboro, and maybe even Fargo.

    UND Fighting Sioux Nickname–a great name with lots of pride behind it. Bleeding heart liberals are going to kick UND athletics out of the big leagues because they find the name questionable. Fair or not, digging our heels in to save the name is truly cutting off our nose to spite our face. Life’s unfair. Grow up. Pick a new name, and oh, by the way . . . let’s demonstrate some adult, civil dispute resolution  skills to the scores of college kids watching this.

    MN Gay Marriage–I’ve gone on about this for years. With no compelling reason or example of a greater good being achieved for society in general, a ‘yes’ vote will almost be a guarantee of a court overturn. (see prop 8 in CA) Man up conservative legislators and demonstrate some of the moral integrity you supposedly pride yourselves on: you know how this is going to turn out, yet you turned this difficult decision over to the public and gained some votes in the process. Yeah, there’s integrity.

    Today’s Gay Agenda: Never thought I’d see society regress back to the 40′s and 50′s virtually over night.

    The moral of the story

    2012 - 04.01

    There’s always some talk about ‘morals’ during the Presidential election season. This year is no different.

    It occurred to me that for as long as I can remember, it’s basically one type of person talking about morality: white men in their 40′s and 50′s of a certain socioeconomic status who are on a platform somewhere trying to get their audience to give them something.

    It’s usually preachers looking for money or politicians looking for votes.

    And generally speaking, they don’t talk as much about their high morals as they do about the low morals of the people around them.

    Here’s a few of their favorite targets:

    Gay men: For whatever reason, no one gets too worked up about gay women. It’s gay men that really bother these guys. The good news is, gay men are standing up, getting out and changing public perception. While it’s fun to mock the dizzy queen in a Dolly Parton wig and high heels stumbling down the street in a drunken haze during Pride Week, reality is gays guys are much more like Ricky and me.

    We’re proving the perception that gay men are promiscuous tramps is about as accurate as all straight men are promiscuous tramps. Reality is gay men tend to be slightly dumpy middle aged guys holding hands, wandering into the future together. We just have cleaner cars and greener lawns. We’re working hard for the right to buy contracts from our state governments that would ensure we can protect our assets and take care of each other in our old age. Just like straight couples have been doing for decades. Some of us may celebrate the purchase with a ceremony somewhere, maybe even in a church.

    Women who have sex with men: this one has always been there, but it’s back in a big way this Presidential season, and it’s gone way beyond the abortion debate. Under the guise of protecting religious liberty, conservative politicians are working to make preventive birth control much more difficult to obtain for millions of women. Interestingly, there’s no talk of exactly how pregnancies should be planned nor of any male responsibility in managing family size.

    Single moms: The latest research indicates around 40% of all children born in the US are born to single women. Last I heard, the only time a child was born without the active participation of a human male was about 2,000 years ago. For all the conservative grumbling about these women taking advantage of ‘the system’ there’s someone who is absolutely beyond reproach and carries virtually zero responsibility: the guy who got her pregnant.

    People of other religions: everyone knows the only true religion is the one that is most popular in the US.  All the others are filled with fundamentalist immoral fanatics looking for opportunities to blow things up.

    Today’s Gay Agenda: It’s been my observation that individuals of the highest moral character for the most part don’t make a big deal about it. And they certainly don’t stand on a stage looking down their noses at the world around them.

    Santorum anyone?

    2012 - 03.25

    The more things change, the more they really change.

    I was born about the time JFK was in office, so I’m a little young to remember, but I recall learning there was significant concern about the possibility of a Roman Catholic becoming President. Would he even be electable in an overtly Protestant country? Conspiracy theorists were sure this was a way for the Pope to take over American.

    You know how the story ends.

    Fast forward to 2012. Rick Santorum, a devout Roman Catholic, has the Evangelical electorate worked into a frenzy about how wonderfully conservative he is and how he’s the answer to ‘taking America back’.

    Whatever that means.

    In under 50 years a Roman Catholic has gone from being nearly unelectable to being the conservative Republican Savior of the USA.

    Santorum is well known for his hatred of gays. It appears Jesus has told him to.

    What’s confused me is the fact he’s basically ignoring the gays and going after women as a group to oppress in his campaign.

    You all know the flap about birth control coverage, so I’ll spare you my recap.

    Mother nature in her wisdom provided a completely natural form of birth control for men that often begins in their late 30s and continues on well into old age. For any number of physiological reasons, millions of men become incapable of participating in reproductive intercourse.

    That’s about the most natural birth control method I can imagine.

    Here’s what I don’t understand: To the best of my knowledge, none of the conservative candidates seem to be concerned about religious organizations providing prescription coverage for medication that allows men to put women at risk of becoming pregnant and thereby potentially needing some form of birth control.

    Today’s Gay Agenda: Hypocrisy drives me insane. Whatever this flap is about, I sense it’s not really about religious liberties–it’s about conservatives seeking out a group to oppress. This time they’ve regressed back to the 40′s and 50′s and decided to go after women.

     

    Here’s the problem

    2012 - 03.07

    I’m not a lawyer. I don’t even play one on tv.

    Today’s Forum carries an article about an upcoming challenge the 2004 North Dakota constitutional ammendment defining marriage.

    “Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect.”

    It’s those last few words ”given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect” that will cause problems in North Dakota.

    What’s been happening in other states, and what just happened in California with the reversal of proposition 8 is that when the citizens vote to legalize discrimination against huge numbers of  people, there needs to be a compelling reason that serves the greater good for doing so.

    And that’s where the trouble starts. No one can really seem to come up with one.

    I am actually looking forward to the upcoming MN marriage ammendment vote. Everyone is shocked when I offer my prediction: the vote will pass. Haters will rejoice. The State Supreme Court in MN, like in virtually every other state where it’s been challenged will say “Sorry folks, you cannot vote to deny protection of existing laws to people, no matter how much you hate them, unless you can demonstrate a quantifiable & measurable public good that would be served.”

    Today’s Gay Agenda: Looking forward to how this unfolds. Send my thanks and encouragement to Mr Tweeden for his tireless work toward civil rights.

     

    Winds of change

    2012 - 03.04

    Ricky and I have been traveling quite a bit lately, most recently spending a few days in Atlanta. I’d been able to remain relatively connected and in control via smart-phone and laptops at the hotel and overall had a great balance of get-away relaxing and working.

    Things were heating up at work and I had to take some calls while at a suburban shopping mall. The background noise was so loud that I made a dash for the exit, blowing by an elderly black woman adjusting her handbag and cane as she prepared to push the heavy door open.

    As I continued to yap on my phone,  I passed through the door & stopped and held it open for her. Her expression immediately changed from scowl at being almost run over to wide-eyed thanks at the busily yapping guy flashing a smile & holding the heavy door for her.

    I’m not sharing this story as an example of what a fine gentleman I am, although I still believe good manners include holding a door for a lady when the opportunity presents itself.

    I’m sharing this because I wondered just how many years of her youth this woman spent almost invisible to preoccupied white businessmen, and I wonder when the tide turned for her and other women of color in Atlanta.

    At 48, and from MN I’m not quite old enough to remember much about segregation. Ricky, being a few years older had a very progressive mother who insisted her children be amongst the first white kids bussed across Tulsa to integrate the schools in the sixties.

    But add an extra 20 or 30 years onto that timeline and try to imagine all this woman witnessed in her lifetime.

    I bet there’s many times when she thinks “I never thought I’d see the day.”

    Today’s Gay Agenda: “The people being oppressed are constantly changing, it’s the people oppressing them that never do.” 

    I’ve always liked that phrase.

    Imagine my shock this Presidential campaign when gay people are pretty much a yawn (except for the fact Rick Santorum thinks about gay sex more than anyone I know). Unfortunately women’s health care issues that were supposedly resolved 50 years ago seem to be the hot topic. And just why is it that the men who impregnate these women don’t really seem too concerned about accessibility of birth control?

    Table for two please

    2012 - 03.03

    One of the primary goals of The Gay Agenda is to educate the general population about stuff in gay world. To reassure everyone that the only risk we pose to society is that we will always have cleaner cars and greener lawns than you, but that’s about it.

    This would be one of those educational posts:

    When you are traveling and would like to find a fantastic restaurant (or anything else for that matter) do a web-search for ‘gay______’ For example, tonight we are in Atlanta, so Ricky googled ‘gay Atlanta’ and then clicked on restaurants. Nothing against chain restaurants or hotels, but isn’t the idea of travel to experience something new? (for the record, these sites review all kinds of stuff, not only fabulous gay stuff)

    Here’s why you want to do this:

    One of the accurate stereotypes of homos is that we like nice things, like to be seen at the right places, like to be value conscious, and have no problem spending money on a good time. These gay sites do all the work for us and the only risk we have is chipping our newly buffed nails as we click click click on our laptops in the hotel suite.

    Sorting through the comments:

    Of course you want to read the reviews, but what you REALLY need to pay attention to are the comments. Immediately disregard the scathing bitch-fests from some queen whose tiara is too tight. Life has dumped on her since day one and no restaurant is gonna change that. But give serious attention to the moderate (good and bad) as well the raves.

    This evening Ricky and I dined at what will most certainly make one of our top 20, maybe even top ten restaurants in the world (based on our experience) here in Atlanta. “The Shed” in the Glenwood district, in case you’re near by. Ricky’s entree of duck breast was $17 and my entree of mussels was $14. (I drink $14 martinis all the time. Lots of them.  In succession) Great food at an incredible value. And I thought Tennessee and Oklahoma grits were out of this world until I tasted Georgia grits. Hands down the best.

    Today’s Gay Agenda: No politics, no preaching; no whining or snarking; just a hopefully helpful FYI. Oh and visiting a gay website will not make you gay. Honest.

     

    Something’s Missing . . .

    2012 - 03.01

    The past few years the hottest topic in the polito-sphere was the certain demise of America if equal protection of existing laws were to be granted to couples certain religions don’t like.

    Things picked up steam and several states passed legislation granting equal protection of exisitng state laws to all couples willing to pay a fee to the state government. It’s my understanding some couples celebrate this purchase with receptions, vacations, and (gasp) ceremonies in their church.

    Common sense would dictate that a major campaign topic would be the damage done to America and how the conservatives must return to power before any more damage is done. Six months after the demise of DADT one would expect endless examples of how our military personnel are suffering and our position in the world is weakening.

    Nothing.

    One would expect dozens of examples of how families and children are suffering because the two old guys next door bought a legal document from their state government. One would expect a few snarky homos to pretend they purchased the document; get their communities worked into a frenzy about the damage beings done; and then shout “April Fools!” we didn’t really buy the document, you just imagined the damage!!!

    Nothing.

    Here’s what we did get: a 1950′s discussion about accessibility of birth control.

    Today’s Gay Agenda: Funny how people trying to control others they see as inferior never really changes. I cannot imagine any female with a shred of self-respect voting for any of our current GOP Presidential candidates. Unless may there really is something to the idea women aren’t capable of making decisions and need some man to do that for them.